Review: Forever Vegetal

Forever Vegetal @ Roots & Culture in New City

Don't much care for the title, but nice looking show, particularly Edra Soto's work.

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Print
  • email
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

Review: Scott Stulen

Scott Stulen @ ebersmoore gallery in New City

When I took this assignment I checked out the artist's website and was quite pleased. Looked like very cool work, particularly the installation-based stuff. I was then admittedly dismayed to discover what was primarily a painting show. Instead of lamenting my lot in print, I picked my fave painting and the one sculpture most in tune with my larger reading of the work (two sculptures in the show were my two fave pieces). And that's all good, but had I more space to reflect, I may have been more critical. One bone follows.

On my recent trip to NYC, I made a game of counting how many PBR references I could find in the work during my walk through Chelsea. I could have added "incidents of vinyl." Now, I've enjoyed many a PBR and listened to many a record in my day, but c'mon! The two works below from the above reviewed would have scored in my game:
13. Feathered 2
2. Hipster Owl ironically hates U
Now, I didn't notice Mr. Owl's title till later (Hipster Owl ironically hates U), and maybe it leavens my annoyance with this type of work, but not much.

I get it, I really do. This is my era as well. But cannot we collectively grow beyond this sort of pop-culture-infused... everything???? When are we gonna get over this crap?

I think it's valid to ask if I should have mentioned these concerns in my review, which I didn't really do, explicitly at least. I think no, primarily because it was such a short piece and if I was going to get in to this type of criticism, on an extended level, I would have needed more space. Now, I haven't taken much space here to do it, but I imagine the ration of shit I would get for saying anything "negative" without fully backing it up--see my Emmett Kerrigan fiasco below and I think I backed that up pretty well. Plus the work I picked to discuss was quality stuff; that tree was pretty badass, I just hope it didn't have anything to with Charlie Brown, which, in retrospect, it might have.

Merry Christmas.

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Print
  • email
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

Not a Review: Anish Kapoor's "Memory"

My piece on Anish Kapoor's "Memory" compared to Chicago's iconic "Cloud Gate"

Took a trip to NYC a few weeks back and on a visit to the Guggenheim came upon Anish Kapoor's sculpture "Memory." It struck me as being something like the inverse of Chicago's famed Bean aka "Cloud Gate"--thought that might make for a fun piece. Think it did. Also at the Goog was a massive Kandinsky retrospective. Truth be told I think I have now seen all the Kandinsky I ever need to see in my life, but the sheer scope and range of paintings did provide some interesting insights to the work I was already familiar with as well as expose me to some stuff I had never seen before--who woulda thunk Kandinsky had some weird sexy Matta phase?
6_Black Lines
Also a kooky hieroglyph phase:
Succession
Main point of the trip however, was my buddy Bill's show. Awesome.

PS> also checked out the Urs Fischer show at the New Museum... Peter Schjeldahl nails it in the nyer. Matthew Ritchie at Andrea Rosen was probably my fave gallery show of the trip.

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Print
  • email
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

Musings: (Dis)abling Conditions

My piece on Site Unseen (2009): (Dis)abling Conditions at the Chicago Cultural Center is HERE. Really good show. I had a much stronger emotional reaction to the work than I am used to in my day-to-day art writing.

Some bonus pics:
But what is it on the back, by Debra Tolchinsky
Site Unseen 2009
From the Fat Off Our Bones, by James Kubie and Katrina Chamberlin
Site Unseen 2009
Site Unseen 2009

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Print
  • email
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

Musings: Emmett Kerrigan & Chicago Generally

It's taken me a while to get this one up, for numerous reasons: laziness most pressingly, but also some anxiety and indecision. My essay-ish thing on Emmett Kerrigan's painting (combined with some other Chicago-specific musings) was not the most well received of my writing so far in town, but it almost certainly got the most reads. I, for one, am more or less fine with it, but due to some misunderstandings, we were a little slack on the editing process. That is definitely my bad and, after the grief I received, will not let that happen again. If I'm going to be attacked (and there was more to it than the blog comments), I'd like to be attacked for my best work--that I am best able to defend myself. So, mea culpa, mistakes were made, in first-drafty fashion I let some writerly decisions interfere with strict reportage, not that I was going for strict reportage, but you know what I'm saying. Lesson learned.

PS: wrote a 3000 word piece last week called A response to several messages left in the comments section to a review of a painting show I wrote for the blog Art Talk Chicago, so yeah, I spent some time thinking about this (some might say obsessively). I may try to publish it at some point or just put it up here. Keep a look out.

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Print
  • email
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us

2 "Outsider" Reviews: Clyde Angel & James Castle

Clyde Angel @ Judy Saslow
James Castle @ AIC

Last week I wrote about two "outsider" art shows and as a result obviously spent a lot of time thinking about the concept. First of all, for whatever it's worth, I generally like "outsider" art, it's just that a lot of fun and interest has been taken out of the work as it becomes more popular in whatever way. An example: when I moved to Tuscaloosa, Alabama three or so years ago I was really really excited about the Kentuck Festival, a major folk art fair in neighboring Northport. When I finally got to go to Kentuck, I was massively disappointed: it was all the same ol' shit, nothing "outside" about it. Or it's outsideness had become insideness pretty quickly, if you know what I mean. (That is not to say Kentuck is incapable of putting on a good show, I saw some nice, and occasionally very weird, work in their gallery over the years.)
Clyde Angel
The main thing I like about outsider art is its ability to surprise me--you can see some pretty weird, unusual stuff going on, and sometimes it's really cool and interesting and exciting. Unfortunately, the Clyde Angel show I wrote about did not really do it for me. I say why in my piece and I won't rub it in here, but yeah, not all that unique. Though there was a pretty neat (and crazy expensive) Henry Darger drawing in the back too.
Henry Darger
The second "outsider" show I wrote about was James Castle at the Art Institute. I liked this one quite a bit more primarily because of the things the artist was doing with scale and the very, very strange way he rendered faces as random not-face things--Castle was deaf, which makes it seem like maybe he would pay more attention to faces, but maybe not, maybe he saw them as these completely abstract things separate from communication. Unfortunately, I couldn't get any images that illustrate my point, though the doll kind of does.
James Castle
Good portions of his work were almost downright conventional; his landscapes reminded me of Van Gogh:
James Castle
In a way it's like the "outsider" appellation is both unnecessary and kind of useful. On one hand it provides some interesting things to think about and on the other, so what. So concludes my week in the realm of the outsiders, one pretty neat, one pretty average. Better odds than I'd get in Chelsea.

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Print
  • email
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us